![]() I then wrapped this fledgling shape into a group, a simple yet powerful SketchUp functionality, and elevated it to the prescribed height of 34.5 inches, breathing the first signs of three-dimensional life into my model. Trusting my instincts and the clues before me, I drew the rectangle that would become the island’s top view. From the inspiration image, the island’s dimensions hinted at a standard size-a 4×8. With the base measurements in place, my focus shifted to modeling the island’s primary structure. Refining the Island’s Silhouette: A Dance with Digital Tools This was a dance of details, a meticulous back and forth between my inspiration and my interpretation, to ensure every inch resonated with reality. The post width, the height of the feet, and the thickness of the countertop-each measurement was methodically recorded, ensuring that my model would not only resemble but also echo the proportions of the original design. ![]() Zooming in, I reached for the tape measure tool, my virtual ruler, to extract the dimensions that were not immediately apparent. Then use the tape measure tool to get rough measurements for your object/space. Pro Tip: Use a dedicated SketchUp file with images imported and scaled as best you can. ![]() For this project, I set the countertop height to 34.5 inches from the floor, which would serve as my reference point for all subsequent measurements. With the image fixed in place, I employed the scale tool, a nifty feature of SketchUp that allows me to adjust the image to the exact dimensions needed. ![]() This distinction was crucial for accuracy later in the modeling process. The image I had chosen as my muse was imported, not as a texture, but as an image onto my canvas. Diving into the Digital Blueprint: Crafting the Island’s FoundationĮmbarking on this journey, I started with a clean slate-a basic SketchUp file-to lay the groundwork for my virtual kitchen island. So, let’s dive in and transform what’s real into something even more remarkable in the rendered world. Whether you’re a seasoned designer or a curious novice, this post is tailored to foster learning at every step. Join me as I navigate through this intricate process, from laying down the first shapes in SketchUp to the final rendering touches in V-Ray. By deconstructing the process, we learn not just to replicate but to understand the core of design thinking. With SketchUp’s intuitive interface and V-Ray’s realistic lighting, I embark on a mission to reverse-engineer this design. This results in many clashes for these models, one can uncheck the less important ones, but still there is plenty of work, here:)Īnother benefit is that when you combine all the data and teach your co-workers to upload or publish their work before leaving the building, the data is already in the cloud to review, instead of dealing with things like ‘Arh ■■■■, forgot my laptop with the latest version, etc.This post unfolds the story of a kitchen island that caught my eye on Instagram-a design so captivating it begged to be recreated. One of the strength of using Trimble Connect is that you can do clash detection, a common tool used in BIM, where multiple ‘aspect’ models need to be checked upon.įor SketchUp models, it is wise to uncheck the ‘Same objecttype’, for SketchUp files don’t have a clue on different ‘categories’, or families, like in Revit: You can add multiple section cuts and more view groups as well, btw One can have a quick review, make annotations and save those views with comments and add them to a View group to be discussed in the next meeting: One way to set this up is to upload the main model and the interior model to Trimble Connect and use the viewer to look at the models. I love the discussion tho, I am in search of a solution that has minimal chances for errors to occur! In reality it is a ridiculous request of us to have people review the previous updates before proceeding on their own work. Because of the amount of people involved on one project, these small issues become compounded and the others lose track of the last persons update. I think the system we’re steering towards is keeping the two models separate and then having a “master model” that we will be able to use as a check. The idea of a model with “locked in” features is a fantasy with the amount of changes that occur during meetings, reviews, etc… It’s not really a matter of “who dun it”… It would be nice to incorporate a system that just makes the update in both places (ideally) OR at the very least remind the user that this change needs to be updated in the other model as well. Our problem arises when a design decision impacts the main model (such as a window move) which then sometimes gets overlooked. This is our current workflow at the moment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |